Microorganisms in Biowarfare: Historical and current
perspectives
Biowarfare
refers to the intentional use of biological agents (e.g., bacteria, viruses,
fungi, and toxins) as weapons in war scenarios. Biowarfare agents can be
deadlier than other conventional weapon systems as even minute quantities can
cause mass casualties and/or fatalities depending on the agent used. This practice involves the deliberate use of
pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi) or toxins produced by organisms to cause
disease and death in humans, animals, or plants and this is almost as old as
humanity itself. Since pre-historic and ancient Greek and Roman times there
have been reported examples such as the use of poisoned darts or contaminating
water springs and wells with corpses or cadavers.
Historical
Perspectives on Microorganisms in Biowarfare
One
of the earliest recorded instances of biological warfare was by the Hittites (1500-1200 BCE), who sent diseased
animals into enemy territories, possibly causing tularemia outbreaks. The
Scythians (4th century BCE) were
known to dip their arrows in decomposing bodies or in blood mixed with manure
to cause infections in their enemies.
During
the Black Death (1346), Mongol
forces catapulted the bodies of plague victims over the walls of the besieged
city of Kaffa (now in Ukraine) in an attempt to spread the disease among the
inhabitants. Also in various medieval
wars, it was common to contaminate water sources with dead animals or human
corpses to spread diseases among the enemy forces.
British
forces under Sir Jeffrey Amherst reportedly gave blankets contaminated with
smallpox to Native Americans during the French and Indian War (1754-1763), leading to a smallpox
outbreak among indigenous populations.
During
World War I (1914-1918), Germany
was accused of using anthrax and glanders (a bacterial disease) to infect
livestock and horses.
During
World War II, the Japanese military conducted extensive biological warfare
research under Unit 731. They experimented with various pathogens, including
plague, cholera, anthrax, and typhus, on prisoners of war and civilians in
China. Japanese forces also released
plague-infected fleas over Chinese cities, causing outbreaks and significant
civilian casualties.
Both
the Allied and Axis powers explored research and development on biological
weapons during World War II. The United States and the United Kingdom conducted
research on anthrax, botulinum toxin, and other agents, though they did not use
them in combat.
The
Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union saw an escalation in
biological weapons research. Both superpowers developed extensive biowarfare
programs, stockpiling agents like anthrax, tularemia, Q fever, and smallpox. The Soviet Union’s program was codenamed as
“Biopreparat,” and involved the development of genetically modified pathogens
that could resist antibiotics and vaccines.
Use of microorganism in biowarfare during the past millennia.
Date |
Examples
of the use of microorganism in Biowarfare |
Pre-historic times |
Melanesian tribesman used
arrowheads contaminated with tetanus |
14th century BC |
The Hittite army send rams
infected with tularemia to their enemies |
6th century BC |
Scythian archers infected their
arrows by dipping them into decomposing cadavers and human blood
containing C. perfringens and C. tetani |
1155 |
Emperor Barbarossa poisons water
wells with human bodies in Tortona, Italy |
1346 |
Tartar (Mongol) army catapulted
bodies of plague victims over the city walls of Caffa |
1495 |
Spanish sold wine mixed with blood
of leprosy patients to their French opponents in Naples (Italy) |
1500 |
Pizarro offered
variola-contaminated clothing to South America native communities |
1650 |
Polish fire saliva from rabid dogs
towards their enemies |
1676: Antoine van Leeuwenhoek (Father of Microbiology)
identified microorganisms. |
|
1710 |
Russian army catapulted bodies of
plague victims into Swedish cities |
1763 |
British offered
smallpox-contaminated blankets to Native Americans |
1797 |
The Napoleonic armies floods the
plains around Mantua (Italy) to enhance the spread of malaria |
1861–1863 |
Confederates troops sold yellow
fever and smallpox-infected clothing to Union troops |
Confederates troops contaminate
water supplies for the Union forces with animal corpses |
|
End of the 19th century: development of
the germ theory of disease and foundation of microbiology by Louis Pasteur
(1822–1895) and Robert Koch (1843–1910) |
|
1914–1918 |
German troops sold horses and
mules infected with glanders and anthrax to the Allies German troops attempted to spread
cholera in Italy and plague in St. Petersburg |
1925: The “Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War
of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases and of Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare”, also referred as the “Geneva Protocol”, was signed (38 signatories
and 140 parties) |
|
1939–1945 |
Japanese army poisoned water wells
in Chinese villages to study cholera and typhus outbreaks |
Japanese inoculated prisoners of
war with agents causing gas gangrene, anthrax, meningitis, cholera, dysentery
and plague |
|
1972: The “Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and
Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction”, also referred as the “Biological
Weapons Convention” (BWC) was signed (actually has 182 parties) |
|
2001: The US Patriot Act is signed in, providing Federal
and national law enforcement officials with enhanced counter-terrorism
capacities. |
During the ancient times, in many of the cases (e.g.: plague during the
siege of Caffa, smallpox during the French-Indian War, etc) it is difficult to
distinguish if the disease spread was due to the intentional release of the
microorganisms or if it was due to the limited hygienic conditions during the
period or due to the contact between populations with different immunities. For both microbiologists and historians it is
challenging to distinguish between natural epidemics and deliberate biological
attacks mainly due to the lack of reliable scientific data regarding an alleged
bioterrorism attack, especially before the advent of modern microbiology, the
secretive nature and polemical or Controversial conditions regarding such
biological attacks, etc.
Current
Perspectives on Microorganisms in Biowarfare
International
Law and Biological Weapons Convention
Geneva
Protocol (1925) - The Geneva Protocol of 1925
prohibited the use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare. However, it
did not address the development or stockpiling of such weapons, nor did it have
enforcement mechanisms, making it less effective until later treaties
supplemented it.
Biological
Weapons Convention (BWC) - The 1972
Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) is the primary international treaty that
prohibits the development, production, and stockpiling of biological and toxin
weapons. This was the first multilateral disarmament treaty banning an entire
category of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
It
was formally known as “The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development,
Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons
and on their Destruction”. The
Convention was negotiated by the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament in
Geneva, Switzerland. It opened for signature on 10 April 1972 and entered into
force on 26 March 1975. The BWC supplements the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which had
prohibited only the use of biological weapons.
The BWC has been signed and ratified by 187 countries as of 2024. The
development, production and stockpiling of biological weapons effectively
ceased with the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC)
Today, biological warfare is
feared not mainly nations, but more from terrorist groups or “lone wolves.” Many
believe that terrorists would be incapable of carrying out an effective, large-scale
biological attack. For instance, in 1984, the Rajneesh cult gave food poisoning
to about 750 citizens of a small Oregon town for political purposes by adding
Salmonella to salad bars. Aum Shinrikyo, a Japanese cult, in 1995, experimented
with biological weapons. The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, where
letters containing anthrax spores were sent to media outlets and government
offices, killed about 5 people.
Some believe that a large-scale
bioterrorist attack will occur in the not-too-distant future, but others say
bioterrorism is an ineffective tactic. Attack methods include contamination of
food and water supplies (A), bombs (B), using the mail (C), contamination of
water (F), spraying aerosolized agents (E, G), direct injection (D), or the
infiltration of “suicide infectees” (H).
Advances
in genetic engineering and synthetic biology have raised new concerns about the
potential creation of novel or enhanced biological weapons. Techniques like
CRISPR could theoretically be used to modify pathogens to increase their
virulence, resistance to treatment, or ability to evade detection.
While most nations publicly adhere
to the BWC, there are concerns that some countries may be maintaining or
developing biological weapons capabilities in secret.
Countermeasures
and Global Preparedness against Biological warfare
Biological warfare has a far
greater psychological impact than direct health impact and protective measures such
as massive vaccinations against all possible against biological attacks are
costly and inconvenient.
Biosurveillance
systems, rapid diagnostic tests, and genomic sequencing are crucial tools in
identifying and responding to potential biological attacks. International organizations like the World
Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) play vital roles in monitoring and responding to outbreaks, whether
natural or man-made.
Developing
vaccines and stockpiling antiviral drugs, antibiotics, and other medical
countermeasures and therapeutics against potential biowarfare agents is key
aspect of national preparedness strategies.
Effective response to biowarfare and
bioterrorism requires international cooperation. The Global Health Security
Agenda (GHSA) is one example of an initiative aimed at building global capacity
to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats.
Classification of potential bioterrorism agents capable to cause diseases in humans, according to the United States Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Strategic Planning Group
Category |
Definition |
Agent and Disease |
A |
High-priority agents Easy to disseminate or transmitted (person to person) High mortality rates Potential for major public health impact Cause public panic and social disruption |
Bacillus anthracis (anthrax) Clostridium botulinum (botulism,
toxin) Francisella tularensis (tularemia) Yersinia pestis (plague) Variola major (smallpox) Filoviruses (Ebola, Marburg) Arenaviruses (Lassa, Machupo) Bunyaviruses (Congo-Crimean, Rift Valley) Flaviviruses (Dengue) |
B |
Second highest priority agents Moderately easy to disseminate Moderate morbidity rates and low mortality rates |
Brucella spp.
(brucellosis) Clostridium perfringens (gangrene
and food poisoning, Epsilon toxin) Salmonella spp.
(salmonellosis) Escherichia coli O157:H7
(Hemorrhagic colitis) Shigella dysenteriae (dysentery) Burkholderia mallei (glanders) Burkholderia pseudomallei (melioidosis) Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) Coxiella burnetii (Q
fever) Vibrio cholerae (cholera) Cryptosporidium parvum (cryptosporidiosis) Staphylococcus aureus (food
poisoning, Staphylococcal enterotoxin B) Rickettsia prowazekii (typhus
fever) Alphaviruses (encephalitis) Caliciviruses (gastroenteritis) |
C |
Third highest priority agents Includes emerging pathogens that could be engineered for
mass dissemination Availability and Easy to produce and disseminate High morbidity and mortality rates Potential for major public health impact |
Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis) Nipah virus (encephalitis) Hantavirus (hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome - HFRS,
cardiopulmonary syndrome - HCPS) Chikungunya virus (arthritis and rash) SARS-associated coronavirus (respiratory syndrome) Highly pathogenic strains Influenza Virus (respiratory
syndrome) Yellow fever |
(https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist-category.asp.)
References
· Oliveira M, Mason-Buck G, Ballard D, Branicki
W, Amorim A, Biowarfare, bioterrorism and biocrime: A historical overview on
microbial harmful applications, Forensic Sci Int. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110366
· Riedel S, Biological warfare and
bioterrorism: a historical review, Proc
(Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2004, doi: 10.1080/08998280.2004.11928002
· Clark DP, Pazdernik NJ, Biological
Warfare: Infectious Disease and Bioterrorism, Biotechnology, 2015, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385015-7.00022-3
No comments:
Post a Comment